dan wallace favorite text not in the bible

#Dan wallace favorite text not in the bible full

In other words, another person exists, beyond this king, who is also God. 17) - that this cannot be a predictor of any mere human king.įourth, while the psalmist declares that this king is God in verse 6, in verse 7, he refers to his God. 6), and nations will praise you forever and ever (v. 4), the nations fall at your feet (v.5), reigning eternally (v. 3), majestically rides forth in victory (v. Third, his description of this king is so superfluous - most excellent of men (v. That is, this Davidic son is both “king” and “God.” 1) and at the same time calls him “God” (v. Second, the psalmist addresses this song specifically to “the king” (v.

First, this Psalm is a wedding song and is addressed to a Davidic son who is about to take his bride. You love righteousness and hate wickedness therefore, God, your God, has set you above your companions. Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever a scepter of justice will be the scepter of your kingdom. And to demonstrate this claim, I want to highlight four different texts - two from the Psalms and two from the prophets. Wouldn’t it make sense that the Messiah would be human as well?īe that as it may, while the Old Testament predicts a future human Messiah, I believe it tells us to expect a divine Messiah as well. After all, the Christ, according to the Old Testament, would come from the human line of David. Yet the Jewish expectation was for a human Messiah.

#Dan wallace favorite text not in the bible full

That is to say, from the earliest times, the church affirmed the full deity of Christ, and rightly so. This clarity is why the Council of Nicea (AD 325) affirmed that the Son shares the exact same nature with the Father. It’s hard to read texts such as John 1:1-4, John 8:58, Romans 9:5, or Hebrews 1:8, and come to any different conclusion. Most readers of the Bible affirm that the New Testament unequivocally proclaims the deity of Christ.